Comedy Central host Charlamagne triggers the Vice President

 

[VIDEO] So CNN at the start of the above clip did a brief segment on the interview with Charlemagne who has his own TV program on Comedy Central - unknown to me. It got a bit heated and the journalists - whom I don't know because I don't watch CNN - discuss the Vice President's intensity once Charlemagne asks who's actually President "Brandon" or Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia.

To see another angle how about this video dropped this morning by Mark Dice. [VIDEO]

What would be discussed off of CNN - a news network I generally don't watch - is that that Vice President Harris is tightly controlled. Waiting for orders as far as how to respond and this interview got to the point where her aides just were ready to cut this off as discussed in this video from ABL. [VIDEO]

So what do I think? There are two sides to every story that's how you arrive at the truth.

I can't say that the Vice President was wrong to push back against Charlamagne. Then again even if I see evidence that in the past Charlamagne actually defended Kamala Harris and I even saw one video from CNN where he says then Sen. Kamala Harris did terribly in her debate with then Vice President Mike Pence. At the same time he's asking the question that perhaps most on the right are asking, no one can believe that President Bra.... Joe Biden is actually running the country and America seems to be ran so poorly right now.

I just saw a video this morning which discusses the President's approval, however, the Vice President approval isn't that much better perhaps even worse in some instances. In the CNN video at the top they further discuss the President's "Build Back Better" agenda and we know in the news that it has essentially stalled. His $2 trillion dollar agenda stalled in the Senate and further work on getting that through Congress has been tabled until next year. This is where you begin to see how some on the right starts discussing the collapse of an American President.

Dice's video further refers to the Vice President as entitled in her response to Charlamagne. ABL just refers back to the Vice President's issue of being disingenuous in her response. One way I could look at this is as a political move for her to state that Joe Biden is POTUS, how would it look if she seemed to throw the President under the bus.

Perhaps it wasn't done out of loyalty, it was done to protect herself. Perhaps there's a lot more going on behind the scenes that we've only begun to scratch the surface....