Going through posts at Instapundit - which has been more of a routine as of late - i saw this WP article clicked the link and read into it. The Roe of Roe v. Wade wanted her right to privacy to include abortions and was successful. Then it turns out she went from supporting a woman's right to choose to being pro-life. As it turns out after shedding her precedent setting psedonym she shared the true story of this case. This landmark piece of jurisprudence that everyone is fighting over could be based on a lie. She lied about why she wanted to terminate a pregnancy.
Now that I know this as someone who considers himself profile, this changes things. Or at least my view of this story. Perhaps this precedent can't stand any longer...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are now moderated because one random commenter chose to get comment happy. What doesn't get published is up to my discretion. Of course moderating policy is subject to change. Thanks!