I keep noticing how fast the language changes once the votes are counted.
Governor Kathy Hochul faced Bruce Blakeman in New York. He signed a no-new-taxes pledge and dared her to match it. She did not. She talked about not raising taxes for the sake of raising them, and about middle-class cuts already on the books. Then she won.
A few days later, standing with New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, she spoke of working within existing resources but finding a path if more was needed for universal childcare. Not for the sake of it. For a specific need.
Bill O'Reilly looks at that sequence, and at how Democrats are handling the Iran question, in the same clip: [VIDEO]
In the video he treats the tax talk as the progressive side arriving on schedule after the campaign talk of affordability. He asks what the new taxpayer-funded piece will actually cost.
On Iran the posture is the other half of the segment. O'Reilly frames Democratic opposition as a form of surrender: consistent rejection of any pressure that might force the regime to abandon nuclear work, ballistic missiles, Revolutionary Guard power, and proxy funding. The party line, in his reading, is that whatever Trump does is wrong—whether strikes that degrade capability or a negotiated outcome that requires inspectors and limits. With new majorities, the talk is already of using the power of the purse to choke off funding for the conflict.
He pairs that with the short-term economic cost. Higher oil prices from disrupted shipping helped drive the midterm losses. Trump himself has acknowledged the pain. O'Reilly's point is that the alternative—leaving a regime that has armed Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis, and that has violated prior nuclear limits—is worse, and that Democrats will call any resolution a failure because the president is Trump.
The two subjects sit next to each other in the segment the way they sit next to each other in the week: one about what a blue-state governor will fund next, the other about what the national party will accept on a foreign threat that is not theoretical.
Your thoughts.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are now moderated because one random commenter chose to get comment happy. What doesn't get published is up to my discretion. Of course moderating policy is subject to change. Thanks!