Not a War on the Lab

 The clip title says the left is losing its war against biology. I had to stop on the phrase. War on biology can mean a lab. A chromosome. A drug. That is not what they are talking about.

Jeremy Boreing posted the cut Monday. The sit-down is from September 16, his Wednesday live with Kurt Schlichter, Zuby, and Nathan Finochio. The phrase shows up about two minutes in, after they have already said the quiet part.

Watch the clip here [VIDEO]

The point is that an advantage is not a confession. Beautiful, intelligent, strong, born to means: use it, and do not impoverish yourself to prove a point nobody asked for. Weak, get stronger. Unattractive, grooming does more than a speech. Sydney Sweeney is the exhibit. The modesty argument, Boreing grants, is a real argument. What he likes is that she is not ashamed of being Sydney Sweeney. One of them calls the male gaze a female superpower. Wrong uses exist. The attraction, he says, is not the crime. Every person here got here because a man was attracted to a woman.

That is what they mean by the war. Not a lab, and not what Boreing calls the good fight, tamping down a sin. The other fight. Rewriting what men have found attractive in women, and women in men, and force-feeding a standard the room says men reject on sight. He folds merit and markets into the same move. Some cards are dealt. Play them. Sports is where he says the war pauses. People accept the fastest runner and the heaviest lift. Off the field the boxes start. The room then points at Zuby and calls him the 2019 women's deadlift champion. That is his old joke, not a title. The point is that a man in the women's category is not, on their account, a close call.

Harrison Bergeron is the story they remember as the warning, different gifts left free, and Boreing suspects it would now be screened as the future. The closer is the disparity line. Downstream of diversity, he says, is different interests, different jobs, different incomes. Not a verdict on moral worth. The tall athlete is a better basketball player, not a better man. His guess for why that distinction fails is secularism. Equal before God used to be enough. Without that, equality has to be collected here, in every column.

The full episode is here: [VIDEO]

Why We Need to Bring Back Bullying is the September 16 Wednesday live with Kurt Schlichter, Zuby, and Nathan Finochio, and the title is the argument, not a side joke. The rule they want retired is the one that said do not be mean, do not punch down, never make anyone feel bad. Shame, they say, is what used to mark stupid, ugly, and ridiculous before those words became unsayable, and a culture that cannot say them cannot defend a standard. They tie that to a feminized consensus, where feelings outrank a decision and leadership never forces one. The late stretch is the exhibit. Prom queen, on their account, is a beauty title, not an inclusion slot. Weird, they say, is not the same as good, and someone should have said so earlier than the internet. Sydney Sweeney is the shot they want taken. A New York Post writer dumped on her, and the room wants the shame sent back, as course correction. The male-gaze line sits in that same permission. It is a sentence they say you are no longer allowed to speak, which is the bullying they mean. Not a fist. A public no.