I really wish we could consider this in Illinois. Up until it was time to enact our state's 1970 constitution this state had no income taxes. Last year we raised income taxes while it was important for the sake of this state's fiscal health to do so, I've seen some pieces that suggest that it wasn't even enough. On saving grace to income taxes in this state is that it's a flat tax but there are those who want to change that to progressive taxation.
This op/ed explores the tax regimes of other states around the nation:
Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin is starting to feel surrounded. On her state's southern border, Texas has no income tax. Now two of its other neighbors, Missouri and Kansas, are considering plans to cut and eventually abolish their income taxes. "Oklahoma doesn't want to end up an income-tax sandwich," she quips.Although having chided North Dakota for wanting to abolish their property taxes, that state is noted for the revenues received from their oil & gas revenues. In this op/ed they insist that they must reconsider the long-term solution of abolishing their income taxes instead of the property taxes.
On Monday she announced her new tax plan, which calls for lowering the state income-tax rate to 3.5% next year from 5.25%, and an ambition to phase out the income tax over 10 years. "We're going to have the most pro-growth tax system in the region," she says.
She's going to have competition. In Kansas, Republican Governor Sam Brownback is also proposing to cut income taxes this year to 4.9% from 6.45%, offset by a slight increase in the sales tax rate and a broadening of the tax base. He also wants a 10-year phase out. In Missouri, a voter initiative that is expected to qualify for the November ballot would abolish the income tax and shift toward greater reliance on sales taxes.
South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley wants to abolish her state's corporate income tax. And in the Midwest, Congressman Mike Pence, who is the front-runner to be the next Republican nominee for Governor, is exploring a plan to reform Indiana's income tax with much lower rates. That policy coupled with the passage last week of a right-to-work law would help Indiana attract more jobs and investment.
That's not all: Idaho, Maine, Nebraska, New Jersey and Ohio are debating income-tax cuts this year.
But it is Oklahoma that may have the best chance in the near term at income-tax abolition. The energy state is rich with oil and gas revenues that have produced a budget surplus and one of the lowest unemployment rates, at 6.1%. Alaska was the last state to abolish its income tax, in 1980, and it used energy production levies to replace the revenue. Ms. Fallin trimmed Oklahoma's income-tax rate last year to 5.25% from 5.5%.
BTW, for those of you who are concerned about cuts to programs that we take for granted - such as education, police, or even welfare - here's an answer:
The experience of states like Florida, New Hampshire, Tennessee and Texas also refutes the dire forecasts that eliminating income taxes will cause savage cuts in schools, public safety and programs for the poor. These states still fund more than adequate public services and their schools are generally no worse than in high-income tax states like California, New Jersey and New York.Florida is especially noted because it was one state that fell victim to the housing bust. But as you see above it's hailed as an example of how a state has weathered this current recession and shows that taxes aren't relevant to economic growth!
They have also recorded faster revenue growth to pay for government services over the past two decades than states with income taxes. That's because growth in the economy from attracting jobs and capital has meant greater tax collections.
The tax burden isn't the only factor that determines investment flows and growth. But it is a major signal about how a state treats business, investment and risk-taking. States like New York, California, Illinois and Maryland that have high and rising tax rates also tend to be those that have growing welfare states, heavy regulation, dominant public unions, and budgets that are subject to boom and bust because they rely so heavily on a relatively few rich taxpayers.